In a recent post, Steve Matheson, of Quintessence of Dust, points out some serious flaws in one of the very few attempts to demonstrate Intelligent Design scientifically. And he does so in a courteous and respectful manner.
In my opinion (and I'm far from alone) demonstrating ID scientifically would be very difficult, hasn't been done, and there are very few published attempts to do so. Matheson's post includes links to some such attempts, and shows how they are lacking.
Thanks for reading.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment