It is customary to complain of the
      bustle and strenuousness of our epoch. But in truth the chief mark of our      epoch is a profound laziness and fatigue; and the fact is that the real
      laziness is the cause of the apparent bustle. Take one quite external      case; the streets are noisy with taxicabs and motorcars; but this is not
      due to human activity but to human repose. There would be less bustle if      there were more activity, if people were simply walking about. Our world
      would be more silent if it were more strenuous. And this which is true of      the apparent physical bustle is true also of the apparent bustle of the
      intellect. Most of the machinery of modern language is labour-saving      machinery; and it saves mental labour very much more than it ought.
      Scientific phrases are used like scientific wheels and piston-rods to make      swifter and smoother yet the path of the comfortable. Long words go
      rattling by us like long railway trains. We know they are carrying      thousands who are too tired or too indolent to walk and think for
      themselves. It is a good exercise to try for once in a way to express any      opinion one holds in words of one
      syllable. If you say “The social utility of the indeterminate sentence is      recognized by all criminologists as a part of our sociological evolution
      towards a more humane and scientific view of punishment,” you can go on      talking like that for hours with hardly a movement of the gray matter
      inside your skull. But if you begin “I wish Jones to go to gaol and Brown      to say when Jones shall come out,” you will discover, with a thrill of
      horror, that you are obliged to think. The long words are not the hard      words, it is the short words that are hard. There is much more
      metaphysical subtlety in the word “damn” than in the word      “degeneration.”
      But these long comfortable words that save modern people the toil of      reasoning have one particular aspect in which they are especially ruinous
      and confusing. This difficulty occurs when the same long word is used in      different connections to mean quite different things. Thus, to take a
      well-known instance, the word “idealist” has one meaning as a piece of      philosophy and quite another as a piece of moral rhetoric. In the same way
      the scientific materialists have had just reason to complain of people      mixing up “materialist” as a term of cosmology with “materialist” as a
      moral taunt.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
 
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11. 
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.

The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.

The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Sunday, December 06, 2015
Excerpts from Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, 50
Labels:
bustle,
busyness,
Chesterton,
G. K. Chesterton,
long words,
Orthodoxy,
short words
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment