Things I have recently spotted that may
be of interest to someone else:
Christianity: He Lives argues that there
are only two kinds of God's laws.
Christianity Today argues that gullibility is not a spiritual
gift, and notes that evangelical
Christians are more likely to fall for conspiracy theories than the population at large.
GeoChristian reviews a book about the
interaction/discussion between a young-earth creationist, Todd Wood, and an evolutionary creationist, Darrel Falk. They learned to respect
each other as Christians.
Relevant has an essay on how
Ecclesiastes resonates with the current pandemic.
Environment: NPR reports on a study that shows that outdoor
cats have a big impact on birds and small quadrupeds.
Humor: Gizmodo reports that we are living in the golden age of crossword puzzles.
Politics: (or something) The
US Postal Service is in financial trouble, and some people are suggesting that we buy stamps, as a way of helping it, according to
NPR.
FiveThirtyEight discusses what
happens if a presidential candidate dies or can't run for office for
other reasons. (We have the two oldest candidates ever, running.)
Science: Gizmodo on "Why is it so hard to figure out if the Corona virus is airborne?"
The graphic used in these posts is from NASA, hence, it
is free to use like this.
Thanks for looking!
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.

The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Showing posts with label evolutionary creationism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evolutionary creationism. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 22, 2020
Wednesday, April 10, 2019
Sunspots 723
Things I have recently spotted that may
be of interest to someone else:
Christianity: The He Lives blog on what theistic evolution (aka evolutionary creationism) is, and is not.
Finance: Catherine Rampell hopes that President Trump does not appoint Herman Cain to the Federal Reserve.
Food: The Trump administration is being sued by some states, because of roll-backs in standards for school lunches.
Health: FiveThirtyEight discusses the unfairness of the organ donation system.
Politics: S. E. Cupp says that Democrats have repeatedly made errors in reacting to President Trump, and they are doing it again on the Muller Report.
The Associated Press on the recent shake-up at the Department of Homeland Security.
The Associated Press has fact-checked many of President Donald Trump's recent utterances. He has gotten a lot wrong, including where his father was born (!). And he also has been far from the truth on immigration, healthcare, hurricane aid for Puerto Rico, and other issues.
Science: Scientific American reports that cats recognize their names (although the reaction is often not what the owner wants.)
Gizmodo reports that gorillas may grieve for their dead.
Sports: (and race) Kyle Korver, long-time NBA player, who is white, has written an essay on racism.
Sports Illustrated on the struggles, and triumph, of the NCAA women's champion basketball team, Baylor.
The graphic used in these posts is from NASA, hence, I believe, it is public domain.
Thanks for looking!
Christianity: The He Lives blog on what theistic evolution (aka evolutionary creationism) is, and is not.
Finance: Catherine Rampell hopes that President Trump does not appoint Herman Cain to the Federal Reserve.
Food: The Trump administration is being sued by some states, because of roll-backs in standards for school lunches.
Health: FiveThirtyEight discusses the unfairness of the organ donation system.
Politics: S. E. Cupp says that Democrats have repeatedly made errors in reacting to President Trump, and they are doing it again on the Muller Report.
The Associated Press on the recent shake-up at the Department of Homeland Security.
The Associated Press has fact-checked many of President Donald Trump's recent utterances. He has gotten a lot wrong, including where his father was born (!). And he also has been far from the truth on immigration, healthcare, hurricane aid for Puerto Rico, and other issues.
Science: Scientific American reports that cats recognize their names (although the reaction is often not what the owner wants.)
Gizmodo reports that gorillas may grieve for their dead.
Sports: (and race) Kyle Korver, long-time NBA player, who is white, has written an essay on racism.
Sports Illustrated on the struggles, and triumph, of the NCAA women's champion basketball team, Baylor.
The graphic used in these posts is from NASA, hence, I believe, it is public domain.
Thanks for looking!
Thursday, October 04, 2018
What to call your beliefs about origins?
Naturalis Historia has posted an excellent web page, which provides a flow chart for determining what your beliefs about origins are usually called, and also has descriptions of the major categories of belief on origins. (Young-earth creationist, etc.) This post must have been a lot of work.
You may also want to look at my own web page, which attempts to do more or less the same thing.
Thanks for your interest.
You may also want to look at my own web page, which attempts to do more or less the same thing.
Thanks for your interest.
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
What Todd Wood would like to hear an evolutionary creationist say, and what Dennis Venema would like to hear a young-earth creationist say
That's a long title!
I just found two interesting articles, both quite readable, and neither too long for the average reader who is interested in the subject, and neither requiring special background in science or theology. Both of these articles were written for the Colossian Forum.
Todd Charles Wood is a committed young-earth creationist, and a believer. He has sound scientific credentials. (See here for a summary of the information on him. I'm pretty sure that he is no longer at Bryan College, however. Here's his blog.) I have been reading his blog for a few years. He has written an article on what he would like to hear from an evolutionary creationist. Dennis Venema is a committed evolutionary creationist, and a believer. He has sound scientific credentials. (See here for a summary of the information on him. That link also leads to Venema's writing for the BioLogos Forum.) I have been reading his posts in the BioLogos Forum for a few years. He has written an article on what he would like to hear from a young-earth creationist.
So what do they say? Well you can, and should, read the articles. But I can sum it up simply -- each author admits that "his side" doesn't know everything, and should be properly humble about it, and understand that Christians may differ on some issues and still be Christians, and hopes that the representative of the other side will do the same. In the case of Venema and Wood, they have. Unfortunately, that is not always true, and Christianity is worse off because it isn't true.
We don't know everything about origins. We do know that God was involved. Thanks for reading. Read Wood and Venema.
I just found two interesting articles, both quite readable, and neither too long for the average reader who is interested in the subject, and neither requiring special background in science or theology. Both of these articles were written for the Colossian Forum.
Todd Charles Wood is a committed young-earth creationist, and a believer. He has sound scientific credentials. (See here for a summary of the information on him. I'm pretty sure that he is no longer at Bryan College, however. Here's his blog.) I have been reading his blog for a few years. He has written an article on what he would like to hear from an evolutionary creationist. Dennis Venema is a committed evolutionary creationist, and a believer. He has sound scientific credentials. (See here for a summary of the information on him. That link also leads to Venema's writing for the BioLogos Forum.) I have been reading his posts in the BioLogos Forum for a few years. He has written an article on what he would like to hear from a young-earth creationist.
So what do they say? Well you can, and should, read the articles. But I can sum it up simply -- each author admits that "his side" doesn't know everything, and should be properly humble about it, and understand that Christians may differ on some issues and still be Christians, and hopes that the representative of the other side will do the same. In the case of Venema and Wood, they have. Unfortunately, that is not always true, and Christianity is worse off because it isn't true.
We don't know everything about origins. We do know that God was involved. Thanks for reading. Read Wood and Venema.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

