And now we come to the crucial question which truly concludes the whole
matter. A reasonable agnostic, if he has happened to agree with me so far, may justly turn round and say, “You have found a practical philosophy in
the doctrine of the Fall; very well. You have found a side of democracy now dangerously neglected wisely asserted in Original Sin; all right. You
have found a truth in the doctrine of hell; I congratulate you. You are convinced that worshippers of a personal God look outwards and are
progressive; I congratulate them. But even supposing that those doctrines do include those truths, why cannot you take the truths and leave the
doctrines? Granted that all modern society is trusting the rich too much because it does not allow for human weakness; granted that orthodox ages
have had a great advantage because (believing in the Fall) they did allow for human weakness, why cannot you simply allow for human weakness without
believing in the Fall? If you have discovered that the idea of damnation represents a healthy idea of danger, why can you not simply take the idea
of danger and leave the idea of damnation? If you see clearly the kernel of common sense in the nut of Christian orthodoxy, why cannot you simply
take the kernel and leave the nut? Why
cannot you (to use that cant phrase of the newspapers which I, as a highly scholarly agnostic, am a little ashamed of using), why cannot you simply
take what is good in Christianity, what you can define as valuable, what you can comprehend, and leave all the rest, all the absolute dogmas that
are in their nature incomprehensible?” This is the real question; this is the last question; and it is a pleasure to try to answer it.
The first answer is simply to say that I am a rationalist. I like to have some intellectual justification for my intuitions. If I am treating man as
a fallen being it is an intellectual convenience to me to believe that he fell; and I find, for some odd psychological reason, that I can deal
better with a man’s exercise of free will if I believe that he has got it. But I am in this matter yet more definitely a rationalist. I do not
propose to turn this book into one of ordinary Christian apologetics; I should be glad to meet at any other time the enemies of Christianity in
that more obvious arena. Here I am only giving an account of my own growth in spiritual certainty. But I may pause to remark that the more I saw of
the merely abstract arguments against the Christian cosmology the less I thought of them. I mean that having found the moral atmosphere of the
Incarnation to be common sense, I then looked at the established intellectual arguments against the Incarnation and found them to be common
nonsense. In case the argument should be thought to suffer from the absence of the ordinary apologetic I will here very briefly summarise my
own arguments and conclusions on the purely objective or scientific truth of the matter.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Sunday, February 28, 2016
Excerpts from Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, 62
Labels:
agnosticism,
belief,
Chesterton,
G. K. Chesterton,
Orthodoxy,
The Fall
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment