I have given an imaginary triad of such ordinary anti-Christian arguments;
if that be too narrow a basis I will give on the spur of the moment another. These are the kind of thoughts which in combination create the
impression that Christianity is something weak and diseased.
First, for instance, that Jesus was a gentle creature, sheepish and unworldly, a mere
ineffectual appeal to the world; second, that Christianity arose and flourished in the dark ages of ignorance, and that to these the Church
would drag us back; third, that the people still strongly religious or (if you will) superstitious—such people as the Irish—are weak, unpractical,
and behind the times.
I only mention these ideas to affirm the same thing: that when I looked into them independently I found, not that the
conclusions were unphilosophical, but simply that the facts were not facts. Instead of looking at books and pictures about the New Testament I
looked at the New Testament. There I found an account, not in the least of a person with his hair parted in the middle or his hands clasped in
appeal, but of an extraordinary being with lips of thunder and acts of lurid decision, flinging down tables, casting out devils, passing with the
wild secrecy of the
wind from mountain isolation to a sort of dreadful demagogy; a being who often acted like an angry god—and always like a god. Christ had even a
literary style of his own, not to be found, I think, elsewhere; it consists of an almost furious use of the a fortiori. His “how much more”
is piled one upon another like castle upon castle in the clouds. The diction used about Christ has been, and perhaps wisely, sweet and
submissive. But the diction used by Christ is quite curiously gigantesque; it is full of camels leaping through needles and mountains hurled into the
sea. Morally it is equally terrific; he called himself a sword of slaughter, and told men to buy swords if they sold their coats for them.
That he used other even wilder words on the side of non-resistance greatly increases the mystery; but it also, if anything, rather increases the
violence.
We cannot even explain it by calling such a being insane; for insanity is usually along one consistent channel. The maniac is generally
a monomaniac. Here we must remember the difficult definition of Christianity already given; Christianity is a superhuman paradox whereby
two opposite passions may blaze beside each other. The one explanation of the Gospel language that does explain it, is that it is the survey of one
who from some supernatural height beholds some more startling synthesis.
Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Excerpts from Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, 64
Labels:
apologetics,
Chesterton,
G. K. Chesterton,
Jesus,
Orthodoxy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment