Suppose we were investigating whether angry men really saw a red mist
before their eyes. Suppose sixty excellent
householders swore that when angry they had seen this crimson cloud: surely it would be absurd to answer “Oh, but you admit you were angry at
the time.” They might reasonably rejoin (in a stentorian chorus), “How the blazes could we discover, without being angry, whether angry people see
red?” So the saints and ascetics might rationally reply, “Suppose that the question is whether believers can see visions—even then, if you are
interested in visions it is no point to object to believers.” You are still arguing in a circle-in that old mad circle with which this book
began.
The question of whether miracles ever occur is a question of common sense and of ordinary historical imagination: not of any final physical
experiment. One may here surely dismiss that quite brainless piece of pedantry which talks about the need for “scientific conditions” in
connection with alleged spiritual phenomena. If we are asking whether a dead soul can communicate with a living it is ludicrous to insist that it
shall be under conditions in which no two living souls in their senses would seriously communicate with each other. The fact that ghosts prefer
darkness no more disproves the existence of ghosts than the fact that lovers prefer darkness disproves the existence of love. If you choose to
say, “I will believe that Miss Brown called her fiancé a periwinkle or, any other endearing term, if she will repeat the word before seventeen
psychologists,” then I shall reply, “Very well, if those are your conditions, you will never get the truth, for she certainly will not say
it.” It is just as unscientific as it is unphilosophical to be surprised that in an unsympathetic atmosphere certain extraordinary sympathies do
not arise. It is as if I said that
I could not tell if there was a fog because the air was not clear enough; or as if I insisted on perfect sunlight in order to see a solar
eclipse.
Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Excerpts from Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, 67
Labels:
apologetics,
Chesterton,
G. K. Chesterton,
Miracles,
Orthodoxy,
proof,
supernatural
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment