"Christianity is the only religion on earth that has felt that omnipotence made God incomplete."
Here again we reach the same substantial conclusion. In so far as we
desire the definite reconstructions and the dangerous revolutions which have distinguished European civilization, we shall not discourage the
thought of possible ruin; we shall rather encourage it. If we want, like the Eastern saints, merely to contemplate how right things are, of course
we shall only say that they must go right. But if we particularly want to make them go right, we must insist that they may go wrong.
Lastly, this truth is yet again true in the case of the common modern attempts to diminish or to explain away the divinity of Christ. The thing may be true or not; that I shall deal with before I end.
But if the divinity is true it is certainly terribly revolutionary. That a good man may have his back to the wall is no more than we knew already;
but that God could have his back to the wall is a boast for all insurgents for ever. Christianity is the only religion on earth that has felt that
omnipotence made God incomplete. Christianity alone has felt that God, to be wholly God, must have been a rebel as well as a king. Alone of all
creeds, Christianity has added courage to the virtues of the Creator. For the only courage worth calling courage must necessarily mean that the soul
passes a breaking point—and does not break. In this indeed I approach a matter more dark and awful than it is easy to discuss; and I apologise in
advance if any of my phrases fall wrong or seem irreverent touching a matter which the greatest saints and thinkers have justly feared to
approach. But in that terrific tale of the Passion there is a distinct emotional suggestion that the author of all things (in some unthinkable
way) went not only through agony, but through doubt. It is written, “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.” No; but the Lord thy God may tempt
Himself; and it seems as if this was what happened in Gethsemane. In a garden Satan tempted man: and in a garden God tempted God. He passed in
some superhuman manner through our human horror of pessimism. When the world shook and the sun was wiped out of heaven, it was not at the
crucifixion, but at the cry from the cross: the cry which confessed that God was forsaken of God. And now let the revolutionists choose a creed
from all the
creeds and a god from all the gods of the world, carefully weighing all the gods of inevitable recurrence and of unalterable power. They will not
find another god who has himself been in revolt. Nay (the matter grows too difficult for human speech), but let the atheists themselves choose a god.
They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.

The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Showing posts with label religions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religions. Show all posts
Sunday, February 07, 2016
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Excerpts from Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton, 53
There is a phrase of facile liberality uttered again and again at ethical
societies and parliaments of religion: “the religions of the earth differ in rites and forms, but they are the same in what they teach.” It is
false; it is the opposite of the fact. The religions of the earth do not greatly differ in rites and forms; they do greatly differ in what they
teach. It is as if a man were to say, “Do not be misled by the fact that the Church Times and the Freethinker look utterly different, that one is
painted on vellum and the other carved on marble, that one is triangular and the other hectagonal; read them and you will see that they say the same thing.” The truth is, of course, that they are alike in everything except
in the fact that they don’t say the same thing. An atheist stockbroker in Surbiton looks exactly like a Swedenborgian stockbroker in Wimbledon. You
may walk round and round them and subject them to the most personal and offensive study without seeing anything Swedenborgian in the hat or
anything particularly godless in the umbrella. It is exactly in their souls that they are divided. So the truth is that the difficulty of all
the creeds of the earth is not as alleged in this cheap maxim: that they agree in meaning, but differ in machinery. It is exactly the opposite.
They agree in machinery; almost every great religion on earth works with the same external methods, with priests, scriptures, altars, sworn
brotherhoods, special feasts. They agree in the mode of teaching; what they differ about is the thing to be taught. Pagan optimists and Eastern
pessimists would both have temples, just as Liberals and Tories would both have newspapers. Creeds that exist to destroy each other both have
scriptures, just as armies that exist to destroy each other both have guns.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Excerpts from Orthodoxy, by Gilbert K. Chesterton, 25
It is commonly the loose and latitudinarian Christians who pay quite
indefensible compliments to Christianity. They talk as if there had never been any piety or pity until Christianity came, a point on which any
medieval would have been eager to correct them. They represent that the remarkable thing about Christianity was that it was the first to preach
simplicity or self-restraint, or inwardness and sincerity. They will think me very narrow (whatever that means) if I say that the remarkable thing
about Christianity was that it was the first to preach Christianity. Its peculiarity was that it was peculiar, and simplicity and sincerity are not
peculiar, but obvious ideals for all mankind. Christianity was the answer to a riddle, not the last truism uttered after a long talk. Only the other
day I saw in an excellent weekly paper of Puritan tone this remark, that Christianity when stripped of its armour of dogma (as who should speak of
a man stripped of his armour of bones), turned out to be nothing but the Quaker doctrine of the Inner Light. Now, if I were to say that
Christianity came into the world specially to destroy the doctrine of the Inner Light, that would be an exaggeration. But it would be very much
nearer to the truth. The last Stoics, like Marcus Aurelius, were exactly the people who did believe in the Inner Light. Their dignity, their
weariness, their sad external care for others, their in curable internal care for themselves, were all due to the Inner Light, and existed only by
that dismal illumination. Notice that Marcus Aurelius insists, as such introspective moralists always do, upon small things done or undone; it is
because he has not hate or love enough to make a moral revolution. He gets up early in the morning, just as our own aristocrats living the Simple
Life get up early in the morning; because such altruism is much easier than stopping the games of the amphitheatre or giving the English people
back their land. Marcus Aurelius is the most intolerable of human types. He is an unselfish egoist. An unselfish egoist is a man who has pride
without the excuse of passion. Of all conceivable forms of enlightenment the worst is what these people call the Inner Light. Of all horrible
religions the most horrible is the worship of the god within. Any one who knows any body knows how it would work; any one who knows any one from the
Higher Thought Centre knows how it does work. That Jones shall worship the god within him turns out ultimately to mean that Jones shall worship
Jones. Let Jones worship the sun or moon, anything rather than the Inner Light; let Jones worship cats or crocodiles, if he can find any in his
street, but not the god within. Christianity came into the world firstly in order to assert with violence that a man had not only to look inwards,
but to look outwards, to behold with astonishment and enthusiasm a divine company and a divine captain.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Orthodoxy, first published in 1908, by G. K. Chesterton, is in the public domain, and available from Project Gutenberg. The previous post in this series is here. Thanks for reading! Read Chesterton.
Labels:
Chesterton,
G. K. Chesterton,
Orthodoxy,
religions,
self-worship,
Stoics,
worship
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)