The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins, was a best-selling book. The title pretty much explains it.
In the December, 2008 issue of First Things, Antony Flew, who recently converted from atheism to deism, and is mentioned in The God Delusion, responds, in a page or two, to Dawkins. Two things that he says struck me.
First, Flew says that Dawkins is a bigot -- that is, one who is intolerant of other beliefs.
Second, Flew writes that Dawkins is, as a consequence of his bigotry, guilty of an academic sin:
"But an academic attacking some ideological position that he believes to be mistaken must, of course, attack that position in its strongest form." Flew argues that Dawkins has not done that -- he has misrepresented the case for God.
Thanks for reading.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Antony Flew on The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
Labels:
Antony Flew,
bigotry,
Christianity,
origins,
Richard Dawkins
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I skimmed Flew's book about his conversion to theism. It was very interesting. He has intellectual integrity.
Thanks. I didn't read the book, but I think he thinks of himself as a deist, not a theist. (I'm not sure I understand the difference.) And Dawkins thinks that, rather than integrity, Flew has senility. Oh, well. Dawkins isn't getting any younger, either. (Nor am I.)
Post a Comment