This year is, sort of, the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible.
I say "sort of" because the KJV was re-translated more than once, especially in 1769.
A review of books about the 400th anniversary is full of lots of interesting facts and ideas, and well worth reading.
See here for my take on the idea that the King James is the only Bible that should be used -- it isn't, and I explain why.
Thanks for reading this.
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
2 comments:
I would like to say thanks for the time you took in writing this post. You’ve an inspiration for me. You know more about the king james version bible visit at king james version bible
Thank you, Bible king james.
Post a Comment