Things I have recently spotted that may
be of interest to someone else:
Christianity: R. C. Sproul's The Truth of
the Cross (Orlando: Reformation Trust Publishing, 2008) "I
wonder whether Jesus was even aware of the nails and the thorns. He was overwhelmed by the outer darkness. On the cross, He was in hell, totally
bereft of the grace and the presence of God, utterly separated from all blessedness of the Father. He became a curse for us so that we one day
will be able to see the face of God."
Health: The New York Times reports on a Centers for Disease Control recommendation that babies should
not be fed solid food until they are six months old.
Politics: (and maybe computing) A CNN
opinion piece, arguing that unlocking your cell phone should not be a
crime. (It is!)
Science: Wired discusses the possibility, and the sense, or lack thereof, of reviving
the extinct Passenger Pigeon, using some tricks with DNA.
Image
source (public domain)
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Wednesday, April 03, 2013
Sunspots 412
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
It's my opinion that a cellphone is personal property and that its ownership falls under the 4th amendment.
I do believe it is fair to the cellphone companies though to be under the restriction of "carrier locking" until the contract (usually caused by a subsidy) is up.
But contrary, I also believe that established relationships have some bearing here. Say I wanted to buy a phone under a contract and let my friend have it but he uses another carrier - I should be able to do that as long as I remain under contract and live by the terms. (As you can probably surmise - I've done this very thing in the past.)
If the phone is bought outright what right does a carrier have to tell me what I can do with it?
I agree with you entirely.
This is yet another example of how big corporations can often get their way, to the detriment of ordinary people.
Thanks, atlibertytosay.
Post a Comment