Things I have recently spotted that may
be of interest to someone else:
Christianity: An article on the National Association of Evangelical's
web site, indicating that almost
90% of "evangelical leaders" don't believe that pastors should endorse politicians from the pulpit. This survey was taken before President Trump's
executive order of last week on (more or less) this subject. Christianity
Today discusses
the executive order, and says, among other things, that only a small
minority of churchgoers believe that pastors should endorse politicians from the pulpit.
Computing: (or something) Elon
Musk wants to attach our brains to the internet. We're a long way
from being able to do this, but, if we could, there are all kinds of issues. "Could I be hacked?," for example.
Benjamin L. Corey asks "How many people in your local community does your church provide comprehensive medical care for?"
Finance: Listverse reports on the hidden costs of shopping at dollar stores.
Humor: (Not exactly) Listverse describes how
people survived 10 different bear attacks. (In most or all cases, the
bear was surprised. Normally, they don't go around looking for people to attack.)
(Also not exactly) Scientific American reports that all the TVs in the US Food and Drug Administration have been set to show only the Fox News channel.
Politics: NPR reports that President
Trump doesn't like compromising, and claims that he hasn't done so.
NPR also informs us that, as of May 6, there are 129 people officially in the race for President of the USA in 2020. Plus some more who may end up running.
Science: Scientific American reports that, contrary to dogma, nerve
cells in a single organism do not have identical DNA.
FiveThirtyEight reports on how
many insects there are in the world. The answer? A lot, but not as
many as there used to be.
Scientific American has a historical essay on our obsession with lawns.
Listverse reports on 10 strange objects in space, including an asteroid, planets, and galaxies.
Sports: (and finance) National Public Radio reports on the shockingly
low pay of minor league baseball players.
Image
source (public domain)
Musings on science, the Bible, and fantastic literature (and sometimes basketball and other stuff).
God speaks to us through the Bible and the findings of science, and we should listen to both types of revelation.
The title is from Psalm 84:11.
The Wikipedia is usually a pretty good reference. I mostly use the World English Bible (WEB), because it is public domain. I am grateful.
License
I have written an e-book, Does the Bible Really Say That?, which is free to anyone. To download that book, in several formats, go here.

The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.

The posts in this blog are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can copy and use this material, as long as you aren't making money from it. If you give me credit, thanks. If not, OK.
Showing posts with label nervous system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nervous system. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
Thursday, January 17, 2008
"What Have You Changed Your Mind About?" pt. 3
I continue comments on Edge's "World Question" issue, which question is the same as my title. See the first part of this series, which gives some explanation, and the second part.
The first essay on this page of the issue is by Rodney Brooks, who questions the use of computational metaphors to explain the nervous system.
On the same page, Robert Trivers asks:
"And consider one of the great mysteries of mental biology. The human brain consumes about 20% of resting metabolic rate come rain or shine, whether depressed or happy, asleep or awake. Why? And why is the brain so quick to die when deprived of this energy?"
He doesn't know, of course.
Ken Ford used to think that science was practically free of unethical behavior, but has changed his mind, based, he says, on the evidence. He writes:
We do need to teach ethics as essential to the conduct of science, and we need to teach the simple lesson that in science crime doesn't pay. But above all, we need to demonstrate by example that the highest ethical standards should, and often do, come naturally.
Indeed!
I have found this publication to be fertile ground for thought, and expect to continue with this series.
Thanks for reading.
The first essay on this page of the issue is by Rodney Brooks, who questions the use of computational metaphors to explain the nervous system.
On the same page, Robert Trivers asks:
"And consider one of the great mysteries of mental biology. The human brain consumes about 20% of resting metabolic rate come rain or shine, whether depressed or happy, asleep or awake. Why? And why is the brain so quick to die when deprived of this energy?"
He doesn't know, of course.
Ken Ford used to think that science was practically free of unethical behavior, but has changed his mind, based, he says, on the evidence. He writes:
We do need to teach ethics as essential to the conduct of science, and we need to teach the simple lesson that in science crime doesn't pay. But above all, we need to demonstrate by example that the highest ethical standards should, and often do, come naturally.
Indeed!
I have found this publication to be fertile ground for thought, and expect to continue with this series.
Thanks for reading.
Labels:
brain,
computing,
ethics,
nervous system,
thinking
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
